<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PHP的单引号和双引号</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.laruence.com/2008/08/19/338.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.laruence.com/2008/08/19/338.html</link>
	<description>PHP语言, PHP扩展, Zend引擎相关的研究,技术,新闻分享 - 左手代码 右手诗</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:31:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: gan</title>
		<link>http://www.laruence.com/2008/08/19/338.html/comment-page-1#comment-5255</link>
		<dc:creator>gan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 09:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laruence.com/?p=338#comment-5255</guid>
		<description>一直在滥用，哈哈，一会单引号一会双引号的写代码，大脑不够使唤</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>一直在滥用，哈哈，一会单引号一会双引号的写代码，大脑不够使唤</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 早起的菜鸟</title>
		<link>http://www.laruence.com/2008/08/19/338.html/comment-page-1#comment-4938</link>
		<dc:creator>早起的菜鸟</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 10:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laruence.com/?p=338#comment-4938</guid>
		<description>哈哈 楼上真逗</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>哈哈 楼上真逗</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 漫谈引号及转义－与正则表达式、SQL结合</title>
		<link>http://www.laruence.com/2008/08/19/338.html/comment-page-1#comment-2449</link>
		<dc:creator>漫谈引号及转义－与正则表达式、SQL结合</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 11:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laruence.com/?p=338#comment-2449</guid>
		<description>[...] 至于两者的速度，从逻辑上推理，单引号的功能少、规则简单，应该比双引号的速度快。风雪之隅也曾撰文《PHP的单引号和双引号》，从Opcodes的层面，得出了“单引号比双引号快”这个结论。但我之前针对纯字符串（无转义、无变量引用）做过测试，得出的结论竟然是“双引号比单引号快”。大家也可以写一下代码测试一下单双引号在不同情况下的速度。 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 至于两者的速度，从逻辑上推理，单引号的功能少、规则简单，应该比双引号的速度快。风雪之隅也曾撰文《PHP的单引号和双引号》，从Opcodes的层面，得出了“单引号比双引号快”这个结论。但我之前针对纯字符串（无转义、无变量引用）做过测试，得出的结论竟然是“双引号比单引号快”。大家也可以写一下代码测试一下单双引号在不同情况下的速度。 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.laruence.com/2008/08/19/338.html/comment-page-1#comment-538</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 17:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laruence.com/?p=338#comment-538</guid>
		<description>W3C里对引号好像没有特殊要求把？好像用validator=strict也没测出来过不符合标准</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>W3C里对引号好像没有特殊要求把？好像用validator=strict也没测出来过不符合标准</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 雪候鸟</title>
		<link>http://www.laruence.com/2008/08/19/338.html/comment-page-1#comment-105</link>
		<dc:creator>雪候鸟</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 03:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laruence.com/?p=338#comment-105</guid>
		<description>恩，其实，用哪个完全是个个人喜好问题， 有人会说，对效率有影响，那是有点太极端了

我这篇文章，只是分析一下孰快孰慢而已，;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>恩，其实，用哪个完全是个个人喜好问题， 有人会说，对效率有影响，那是有点太极端了</p>
<p>我这篇文章，只是分析一下孰快孰慢而已，;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 歪歪</title>
		<link>http://www.laruence.com/2008/08/19/338.html/comment-page-1#comment-104</link>
		<dc:creator>歪歪</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 03:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laruence.com/?p=338#comment-104</guid>
		<description>要滥用才好</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>要滥用才好</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 雪候鸟</title>
		<link>http://www.laruence.com/2008/08/19/338.html/comment-page-1#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>雪候鸟</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 06:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laruence.com/?p=338#comment-61</guid>
		<description>^_^，好吧。。</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^_^，好吧。。</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ylcz</title>
		<link>http://www.laruence.com/2008/08/19/338.html/comment-page-1#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>ylcz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 06:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laruence.com/?p=338#comment-60</guid>
		<description>我习惯，我滥用</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>我习惯，我滥用</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

