Press "Enter" to skip to content


今天有人在微博上问了一个问题, 使用:

string exec ( string $command [, array &$output [, int &$return_var ]] )

调用一个程序, 程序退出-1, 但是PHP得到的为什么是255?

这个问题简单的说, 是因为exit或者main函数中的return, 只能使用0~255之间的值. -1 的unsigned值就是255.


我们知道, 在Shell中, 运行一个命令, 一个程序, 都是fork一个子进程(然后exec)来执行的, 而这个程序的退出码, 被Shell(父进程), 通过wait来收集而后报告给我们的.

pid_t wait(int *statloc);

而对于wait来说, 历史上原因, 他将通过statloc返回一个16bit的interge(现在也有用32位表示的, 但是会兼容已有的设计). 这16bits的interge中, 高8位就是程序退出的值(exit, 或者return), 而低八位表示导致这个程序退出的信号(其中一位表示是否有Core文件产生), 如果程序是正常退出, 那么低八位为0[1].

所以, 如果我们返回-1, 并且因为我们是正常退出, 所以Shell通过wait收集到的子进程退出状态是:

11111111 00000000

而高八位作为unsigned, 就是255了.

另外, 补充一下, 在Linux的内建Shell命令中, 很多都会遵守一个退出状态码的约定, 具体的值对应的意思[2]:

Exit Code Number Meaning Example Comments
1 Catchall for general errors let “var1 = 1/0” Miscellaneous errors, such as “divide by zero” and other impermissible operations
2 Misuse of shell builtins (according to Bash documentation) empty_function() {} Seldom seen, usually defaults to exit code 1
126 Command invoked cannot execute Permission problem or command is not an executable
127 “command not found” illegal_command Possible problem with $PATH or a typo
128 Invalid argument to exit exit 3.14159 exit takes only integer args in the range 0 – 255 (see first footnote)
128+n Fatal error signal “n” kill -9 $PPID of script $? returns 137 (128 + 9)
130 Script terminated by Control-C Control-C is fatal error signal 2, (130 = 128 + 2, see above)
255* Exit status out of range exit -1 exit takes only integer args in the range 0 – 255


  1. Falcon
    Falcon 2016-07-27

    可以的,这很鸟哥! 解释的很清楚

  2. I’ve been exploring for a little for any
    high-quality articles or weblog posts in this
    kind of house . Explorring in Yahoo I eventually stumbled upon this
    website. Studying this info So i’m glad too express that I have a very excellent uncanny eeling I found out exacgly what I needed.
    I most indisputably will make ceretain to don?t put out of your mind this website
    and give it a glance regularly.

  3. 膜拜
    膜拜 2012-07-28


  4. deven
    deven 2012-04-12


  5. Lukin
    Lukin 2012-03-15


  6. ooxx
    ooxx 2012-02-03


  7. 唐僧
    唐僧 2012-02-02


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *